Search for: "Us Probation Dept" Results 1 - 20 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
View the article here By Dean Muchow Investigative Reporter Boise, Idaho, District Four of the Idaho Dept. of Probation and Parole Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 - Special investigators from the Idaho Dept. of Corrections (IDOC) and the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:08 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although the lower court had not abused its discretion in revoking the sentence of probation based upon defendant's admitted violations thereof, the Fourth Department in People v Rapone (2010 NY Slip Op 02611 [4th Dept 3/26/2010])reversed that court's revocation of probation based on a probation violation and its imposition of a prison sentence, and ordered that the sentence of probation originally imposed be continued. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:17 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
Both probation periods tolled during confinement, so the DOC was actively supervising him on the 2010 misdemeanor probation and the 2012 misdemeanor probation following his release from prison after serving the felony sentence. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 6:19 am by Brian Shiffrin
In other words, a court may not use probation as a rider to extend a person's exposure where it is also imposing a sentence of more than 60 days. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:41 pm
US Dept. of Probation, Nos. 06-2360,  07-1687,  07-1274,  05-2712,  05-2307,  05-2306,  05-2259 (unpublished). [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:21 pm
., 3rd Dept., 291 A.D.2d 778Disciplinary action was initiated against Randall Davis by his employer, the New York State Division of Military Affairs and Naval Affairs [DMNA], based on allegations that he was guilty of violating DMNA's Internet policy by visiting inappropriate websites, including pornographic websites and using a State-owned computer for "personal busi­ness. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:18 am by Hillary Frommer
The case law has firmly established that the interest that would be adversely affected must be pecuniary in nature (see, e.g., In re Hall, 12 AD3d 511 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:18 am by Hillary A. Frommer
The case law has firmly established that the interest that would be adversely affected must be pecuniary in nature (see, e.g., In re Hall, 12 AD3d 511 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:41 am
., First Dept, 266 AD2d 167Queally v Safir, App. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:35 am
The best point made in this rather humorous post on the Florida Probate Litigation Blog is that we shouldn’t need an appellate opinion to tell us this but now we’ve got one (in Florida anyways). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Watts, 211 Conn. 323 (1989), Matter of Keuning, 190 A.D.2d 1033, 593 N.Y.S.2d 653 (4th Dept. 1993), and Matter of Molloy, 214 A.D.2d 171, 631 N.Y.S.2d 910 (2nd Dept. 1995), Troy v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:02 am by Scott Grabel
Gullion worked in the Ninth Precinct, and began his career with the Detroit Police Dept. in 2009. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by Hillary Frommer
The issue in Grunwald, was whether the probate proceeding was pending in the proper New York county. [read post]